SEO + GEO evidence review for SaaS and indie tools

See the evidence behind your website’s search readiness.

Inspect one public page, its HTML and crawler preferences. Separate observed issues from missing evidence. Actual AI mentions, citations and business outcomes are not measured by this scan.

Free scan · No signup · First snapshot in about 60 seconds

Want to see the output first? View an example audit report

1 URL
defined scan scope
4
evidence tracks
No score
no invented certainty
Versioned
repeatable checks

Every finding includes its scope and rule version. Unknown access, indexing, factual support and AI visibility remain unknown. Fixes require observed evidence and a verification step.

Free audit

Run a RankFortune scan

Ready
CrawlHTML
CheckRules
ReportJSON

Free scan runs immediately. An email is optional for the paid report workflow. Usage measurement excludes your URL, inputs, session, and report contents. Privacy details.

Illustrative layout — not a live audit

sample-saas.example · placeholder data

Evidence-based readiness review

Samplenot a score

Technical observations

Partial

Public HTML inspected. Real crawler access and indexing still need evidence.

Content evidence

Partial

Candidate content found; factual support requires source review.

Actual AI visibility

Not measured

No target AI answers queried; no citation or traffic claim.

Sample gaps

P1
Repair malformed JSON-LD

Illustrative issue: fix a syntax error in an existing applicable block; do not add arbitrary schema types.

P1
Review a scoped search restriction

Illustrative issue: confirm the named bot and URL should be public before changing a rule. Keep training preferences unchanged.

Metadata review example

Preview
Suggested title
Sample SaaS - AI workflow automation for small teams
Suggested FAQ
What does Sample SaaS do, who is it for, and how is it different from alternatives?

Prompt research examples

Not measured
ChatGPT candidateNot queried

Best AI workflow automation tools for small teams

Example only: validate this prompt separately before treating it as evidence.

Perplexity candidateNot queried

Sample SaaS alternatives for founders

Example only: no competitor citation result has been measured here.

Gemini candidateNot queried

Is Sample SaaS good for secure team workflows?

Example only: use this as a research prompt, not a visibility claim.

Methodology

Built around audit, evidence, and execution.

Keep technical observations, content evidence, actual AI visibility and business outcomes separate. The free scan measures only a limited part of this framework; the remaining checks are explicitly unresolved.

Technical observations

Inspect raw HTML, canonical declarations, page directives, robots preferences and one sitemap candidate. Actual indexing and bot access remain separate checks.

Content and claim evidence

Extract metadata and content candidates. Task completeness, factual claims, expertise and sources require independent review.

Actual AI visibility

The free scan marks this not measured. Target-product queries and visible source records are required before reporting mentions or citations.

Business outcomes

The free scan marks this not measured. Attributable referrals and conversions need first-party data, not a readiness score.

Workflow

Evidence you can inspect.

Inspect scoped findings, choose justified changes and retest the same final URL with the same rules. Competitor experiments, prompt monitoring and attribution need separate evidence collection.

01

Scan

Read one public URL and scoped supporting files.

02

Inspect

Separate observations, issues and unknown evidence.

03

Act

Choose justified changes; preserve intentional exclusions and training preferences.

04

Retest

Compare the same final URL and rule version. Changed checks do not prove citation or traffic gains.

Compare tools

Not every AI visibility tool solves the same problem.

Some products are built for a first audit. Others are built for continuous monitoring and wider authority workflows. Use the comparison guide to choose the right next step for your team.

Page diagnostics

Useful for scoped HTTP and HTML observations.

Answer observations

Useful for actual mentions and visible citations under recorded conditions.

First-party analytics

Useful for attributable visits and business events.

Compare SEO + GEO evidence review tools
Tool category
What competitors emphasize
Where teams get stuck
RankFortune angle

Public-page scan

One URL and supporting files.

Cannot establish real indexing or AI citations.

RankFortune records sources, states and limits for each finding.

Target AI observations

Actual answers and displayed source URLs.

Not collected by this free scan.

Collect separately; a model-generated narrative is not this evidence.

Business measurement

Attributable referrals and defined conversion events.

Requires first-party data and comparable windows.

Do not infer business impact from a changed metadata check.

AI search pages

Start with the audit page that matches the buyer question.

These focused pages cover the main search intents around AI visibility, answer engine optimization, GEO, and model-specific readiness checks.

AI Visibility Audit for Websites

Review search readiness with inspectable evidence.

A one-URL diagnostic for founders and agencies, with technical observations kept separate from actual AI visibility.

AI Search Visibility Checker

Inspect AI-search preparation, not an invented visibility score.

Review public-page evidence before choosing any engine-specific change.

ChatGPT Visibility Checker

Review public-page readiness for ChatGPT Search.

This checker inspects website evidence; it does not query ChatGPT or explain an unobserved omission.

Perplexity Visibility Checker

Inspect Perplexity search-rule evidence for one URL.

The free scan reads PerplexityBot preferences, not live Perplexity answers or rankings.

Reddit and Community Evidence Review

Plan an honest community-source review.

This scan does not search Reddit, count community mentions or measure Reddit-derived AI citations.

AI Agent Observability Website Review

Review the public evidence for your agent-observability product.

Use the scan for public HTML observations; review traces, integrations and outcome claims separately.

LLM Visibility Audit

Separate model knowledge from search evidence.

The free scan checks public HTML; it does not measure what every language model knows about your brand.

AI Overviews Visibility Checker

Review Google AI search prerequisites and unknowns.

Inspect the public URL, then verify actual Google indexing and effective Search generative AI settings with account evidence.

GEO Audit Tool

Turn SEO + GEO evidence into scoped actions.

A versioned diagnostic for technical observations, content evidence, actual AI answers and business results.

Visibility preview

Separate observations from research questions.

RankFortune records public-page evidence and unresolved checks. Actual AI answers, competitor comparisons and business outcomes require separate observations. Read the methodology before interpreting a report.

Query research

Candidate questions for a future test, not measured citation gaps.

Claim evidence

Review whether the stated source supports the exact product claim.

Competitor context

Domains are recorded only; the free scan does not crawl or compare them.

Measurement plan

Record target product, market, query, date and visible sources before making comparisons.

Pricing path

Start free, upgrade for the full report.

Start with a free scan, then upgrade for the full evidence report and export. Monitor is planned and not open for new subscriptions.

Free Snapshot

$0

One-URL evidence review, not a citation measurement.

  • ✓ No login for first scan
  • ✓ Versioned observations
  • ✓ Search and training separated
Run free scan

Full Report

$19

The captured evidence in an emailed report.

  • ✓ HTML and Markdown report
  • ✓ Scoped issues and limitations
  • ✓ Verification checklist
Run scan first

Monitor

$39/mo

Planned service. New subscriptions are not open; scheduled monitoring is not currently delivered.

  • ✓ Planned: scheduled observations
  • ✓ Planned: comparable history
  • ✓ No live citation tracking promised
Not open for purchase

FAQ

Answer the questions AI engines and buyers both ask.

Direct answers about what RankFortune checks, who it is for, and what you get from the free scan and the full report.

What does the free scan actually check?

It reads one public URL, robots.txt and one sitemap candidate. It reports raw-HTML metadata, JSON-LD, links and named crawler preferences, with scoped evidence and unknown states.

Does this measure real AI citations?

No. The free scan does not query AI answers, crawl competitors or connect analytics. Actual mentions, citations and business outcomes require separate observations.

What do I receive?

Four separate evidence tracks, observed issues, unresolved checks, sources and verification steps. There is no combined GEO score or automatic requirement to publish FAQ, comparison or pricing pages.

Should I allow training crawlers to improve search?

Search, training and user-triggered access are separate purposes. RankFortune does not penalize training opt-outs or change your robots rules.

Do I have to finish an audit before measuring citations?

No. Technical diagnostics and actual AI observations can be collected independently. Keep their scope, dates and meanings separate.

Buyer fit

Built for people who need an answer this week.

Get a fast, credible audit that shows what to fix before you invest in heavier AI visibility monitoring.

Indie SaaS

Understand public-page observations and the evidence still needed.

SEO teams

Review engine-specific rules without confusing training and search.

Agencies

Deliver scoped findings, limitations and verifiable implementation steps.

Full report

Know exactly what the full report includes.

The free scan gives you the first diagnosis. The full report turns that diagnosis into exportable recommendations and a fix plan.

What the $19 report includes

  • Four independent evidence tracks, without a combined GEO score
  • Scope, timestamps and sources for the scan
  • Observed issues and unresolved checks kept separate
  • Verification steps for justified changes
  • Observed metadata to review, not invented publish-ready claims
Run scan first