Use real discussions, not manufactured mentions
When independently reviewing a public thread, retain its date, context, actual author statements and any affiliation disclosure. Do not create fake reviews or concealed promotion.
Reddit and Community Evidence Review
Plan an honest community-source review.
This scan does not search Reddit, count community mentions or measure Reddit-derived AI citations.
What RankFortune checks
- Raw HTML metadata and declared canonical
- Generic and matching-agent indexing directives
- Named search, training and user-fetch robots preferences
- One sitemap candidate, internal links and JSON-LD syntax
What you get back
- Observed issues and unknown checks, kept separate
- Sources, timestamps, scope and versioned rules
- Verification steps; actual citations and conversions remain not measured
Check whether the discussion supports the claim
A reachable thread or a mention of the brand does not establish that the product recommendation is supported. Compare the exact claim, quoted context and product version.
What happens after the scan
Review justified actions against the actual page goal. Add only truthful, applicable content or markup. The free scan does not crawl competitors, connect analytics or query target AI products; independent review and observations can proceed alongside it.
FAQ
Questions this audit answers
Does this scan measure actual AI visibility?
No. It is a public-page readiness review. The report marks actual AI mentions, citations and business outcomes as not measured.
Are FAQ, pricing and comparison pages mandatory?
No. They are only candidate content patterns. Their absence is not a failure or a reason to publish low-value variations.
Can I compare two scans?
Compare the same final URL and rule version, with the same intended scope. Preserve unknown states and confirm important changes with the appropriate external evidence.